Eight environmental groups and The Associated Press last week filed Freedom of Information Law requests with the state Office of Emergency Management seeking details about shipments of explosive crude oil from the Bakken shale region. The fuel is shipped via trains on 1,000 miles of rail line across the state, through big cities like Buffalo, Syracuse and Albany, through small communities in Washington and Saratoga counties, and down through the Hudson Valley.
When there was leak of 100 gallons of fuel at the Port of Albany last month, officials didn’t bother to tell Albany County officials about it for the purposes of emergency response management.
The state has the details about the shipments of Bakken crude in its possession, including information about the exact routes and how much fuel is being transported. But the state, so far, has declined to share that information with its citizens.
It’s now mulling over the FOIL requests, and says it will respond within 20 days. That’s too long. A lot of bad can happen in 20 days. Just look at the other disasters in the U.S. and Canada involving this fuel to see just how bad. How could the state justify a delay of even one day in sharing this information with the public?
The railroad companies claim that releasing it could compromise the security of the shipments. Yet several other states, including heavily populated states like Florida and California, have released the information, apparently placing their citizens’ welfare above some vague security concerns. The attorney general in North Dakota, where this fuel comes from, said there is no legal basis for withholding the information. Why, then, would New York state officials refuse for one day to inform the public about the potential danger, much less wait three weeks just to decide whether to release it?
It shouldn’t take a Freedom of Information Law request to get this information released to the public. All the state should be looking at is who needs to know this information.
And the answer is, we all do. Right now.
— Daily Gazette, Schenectady
The Otsego County Sheriff’s Office is in the midst of its annual two-week marijuana eradication campaign.
We have no doubt that Sheriff Richard Devlin Jr.’s heart is in the right place, wanting his county to be free of illegal drugs, but we respectfully wonder if we can say the same about his brain when it comes to this enterprise.
With a surge in heroin and prescription drug abuse in our area, any major use of department resources to hunt down marijuana growers makes very little, if no sense at all.
The annual eradication efforts are scheduled in advance, Devlin said, and do not interfere with other drug busts or investigations.
How is that? If the sheriff’s office and other agencies are spending two weeks tracking down and arresting marijuana growers, they could be working on the area’s much more serious heroin and prescription drug problems.
While it is true that using or selling marijuana is against the law, one day it won’t be. There is a rising tide of public opinion for the legalization of pot, and it is only a matter of time until New York joins Colorado and Washington — where marijuana use is legal — and California, where it has been decriminalized.
There is no question, however, that heroin and prescription drug abuse are major threats to our youth and to society as a whole.
“We all know we have a huge heroin problem around here,” Devlin said. “But we can’t forget about other problematic drugs, like marijuana.”
But is marijuana really so problematic?
“I consider it a gateway drug,” Devlin said.
That theory means that if someone tries marijuana, it is likely to be a “gateway” to trying more-dangerous drugs.
Indeed, a person who smokes marijuana is more than 104 times more likely to use cocaine than a person who never tries pot, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
That could be partly because the seller of illegal marijuana is likely to be the seller of cocaine and heroin, too. That would not be the case if marijuana were legalized. If we are looking for gateway drugs, how about tobacco and alcohol?
In 1999, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences wrote: “Because it is the most widely used illicit drug, marijuana is predictably the first illicit drug most people encounter. Not surprisingly, most users of other illicit drugs have used marijuana first. In fact, most drug users begin with alcohol and nicotine before marijuana — usually before they are of legal age. . There is no conclusive evidence that the drug effects of marijuana are causally linked to the subsequent abuse of other illicit drugs.”
We strongly urge Sheriff Devlin to make 2014 his last annual marijuana eradication effort.
— Daily Star, Oneonta
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.